Otp send successfully..

A Global Polity for the Citizens of the World

  •  Proposals
    •  View Proposals
    •  Create Proposal
  •  Votes
    •  View Ongoing Votes
    •  Accepted
    •  Rejected
  •  World Parliament
    •  Assembly
    •  Parliament
    •  FAQ
  •  
    • Register
    • Login

Unsuccessful initiative

  1. Home
  2. Archive
  3. Environment
  4. Controversial campaign: THE 20% CHALLENGE
Initiative #99 –  November 19, 2020 Environment Rejected on December 3, 2020

Controversial campaign: THE 20% CHALLENGE

5190 3

THE 20% CHALLENGE is the initiative that proposes a reduction of 20% of global military spending worldwide, in order to invest these resources in the restoration of the Biosphere. This is an innovative and possible solution for peace and climate crisis, that can be implemented in the near future.

 

VOTE

Rejected on December 3, 2020

The votings are already finished. You can see the results here.

DISCUSSION
  1. user avatar
    November 19, 2020
    lalue

    You mentioned that the spending could be used to improve international collaboration. How do you respond to the point that this initative could actually degrade international relations, because it might make some countries break some of their international commitments, like the 2% GDP commitment in NATO?

     

    [Controversial question. Merely to stimulate the debate. I am not a fan of the 2% nor other military spending.]

  2. user avatar
    November 26, 2020
    emilia.ismael

    It is a very interesting campaign but it seems very unlikely due to the nuclear and militar capacity that some countries have. To work, this initiative should have the support of every country in the entire world.

  3. user avatar
    November 26, 2020
    mcw

    To implement your proposal, Naomi, there would have to be some checking of national military budgets and also some intervention if a national government  agrees to to this but does not act in this way. So, how should this be done without powerful, i.e. legitimate, international institutions? This being maybe a hen and egg problem: if there were these institutions the 20 per cent issue maybe would not even exist anymore...

    Beyond this, should there be any kind of forcing govvernments to comply if they do not want to? This raises the abovementioned question even more.

     

NEW COMMENT
Only registered users can comment on this initiative! Please login or register to continue.
Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn
user avatar
naomi.flores99

Climate Activist and Eco-entrepreneur 

 

Currently active Rejected by category
  • UN General Resolutions 495
  • Security & Conflict Resolution 242
  • Human Rights 147
  • Miscellaneous 17
  • Environment 16
  • Research & Education 13
  • Economy 11
  • Health 7
  • Gender Equality 6
  • Norway 1817
  • United Kingdom 1785
  • Brazil 1139
  • Sweden 1015
  • Ireland 761
  • United States 536
  • Canada 527
  • Chile 429
  • Australia 379
  • Indonesia 331
  • Germany 209
  • Japan 196
  • Argentina 194
  • Czech Republic 191
  • Denmark 178
  • France 174
  • Turkey 114
  • Jamaica 109
  • Poland 102
  • Spain 69
  • India 63
  • South Africa 62
  • Netherlands 56
  • Italy 35
  • Nigeria 19
Countries with most Citizens

This project is organized by the World Parliament Experiment e. V. Logo World Parliament Experiment e.V.

and supported by Democracy Without Borders Logo Democracy Without Borders

Copyright © All rights reserved | This template is made with by Colorlib

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Rules
  • FAQ/Help
  • Legal Notice